Quality assurance

How Quality Assurance, Quality Control, And Testing can be distinguished?

Quality assuranceNowadays, most of individuals and institutions find it difficult to distinguish between quality assurance (QA), quality control (QC), and testing. Though there is a close connection between these processes, their conceptions differ. Since all of them are needed for efficient risk management in the area of advancing and operating computer programs, identifying distinctions is of a great importance for the software directors. Their definitions are given below:

  • Quality Assurance: A certain range of operations carried out in order to ascertain in the adequacy of advancing and/or servicing procedure and to ascertain a system is able to attain its objects.
  • Quality Control: A certain range of operations carried out to assess a developed system.
  • Testing: The procedure of running a work product in order to reveal imperfections. (It should be also noted that the “procedure of executing a work product” is about test programming first and only then the process of running the test cases takes place).

QA operations ascertain whether the procedure is appropriate and clarified or not. Methods and standards of advancing can serve as samples of QA operations. A QA survey would mainly aim at the procedure components of a program – e.g., are specifications being described properly. In comparison to QA operations, the main purpose of QC operations is to reveal imperfections in certain deliverables- e.g., are the described specifications the true specifications. Testing is one of QC operations. Among others examination can be also mentioned. As a rule, QA and QC operations are needed to succeed in software advancement.

There is also a possibility of dispute concerning the responsible person for QA and QC operations — i.e., whether an outside organization should be responsible for either QA or QC. As the case may be different answers, but the knowledge of Mosaic says the following:

  • When chief manages should be mainly responsible for execution of the right QA, QC and testing operations on a design, an external QA functionality can be useful for important review and prospect.
  • The experience of an institution and its risk management plays a key role in carrying out external QA/QC. While the institutions are developing and getting more experience, managers and other workers will execute appropriate policy. In this case there is no real need in involving external guides.

To request a quote for software testing services visit BugHuntress website.


TestFort Blog

About TestFort Blog

TestFort blog is an official blog of TestFort QA Lab company and is dedicated to various QA and software testing issues.


6 comments

  1. May 20, 2012 @ 2:42 am recaptcha solver

    Terrific work! This is the kind of information that should be shared around the internet. Disgrace on the search engines for not positioning this put up upper! Come on over and visit my web site . Thanks =)

    • June 22, 2012 @ 7:29 am James

      Many thanks man rlaley nice site plus some excellent articles, keep up the greatI had been surfing search engines and I noticed your website which is quite interesting, keep it up! I simply added this blog website to my search engines readers, excellent things. I Cannot obtain sufficient!

    • July 3, 2014 @ 8:57 am free ets mod

      Thanks for helping out, great information.

    • August 9, 2014 @ 4:47 am Ira Riklis

      This site was… how do you say it? Relevant!! Finally I have found something that helped me. Many thanks!

  2. December 25, 2012 @ 1:59 am derrick rose shoes

    I think you have noted some very interesting details , thank you for the post.

  3. December 25, 2012 @ 2:00 am derrick rose shoes

    As a Newbie, I am always searching online for articles that can aid me. Thank you


Would you like to share your thoughts?

Software testing & QA blog by TestFort © 2017

×